Health Care Here: Q & A on Single Payer Plan

May 5, 2009


Dear friends, relations, neighbors, acquaintances:

If I had the energy, I would write a letter to each of you separately. But I am old and tired; I can’t manage that.

Those of you who know me well know that I have for a long time paid attention to what is going on in the world. Not much of it has made me happy.

But recently I learned of something--a bill in Congress--that is the best news I have heard since the days of FDR. It is HR676, Expanded and Improved Medicare for All. It is a single-payer health care bill, the National Health Insurance Act, sponsored by John Conyers and co-sponsored by 75 others. It will cover every resident of the U.S.

It emphasizes preventive care, includes in-patient and out-patient , emergency, long-term and palliative care . It provides dental care, mental health services, vision care, chiropractic service, podiatric care, substance abuse treatment and prescription drug coverage.

In these days, when health care is the business of investors--of HMOs and PPOs whose single pursuit is profit--we need a different system. Now is the moment to reach for it.

I want to tell you about HR 676. I ask that you read on, and that you act. You may want to skim, choose what to read and what to skip. But you will get the idea. When you have understood what is at issue, please write your members of Congress. And please tell everyone you know about this, as I am telling you

You will ask:What does single-payer mean? Will it be another big bureaucracy?How will HR 676 work? Can we afford it? Who will pay for it? How?Why include everyone? Can we combine it with for-profit plans?Does HR 676 have a chance of passage in Congress? What about similar bills (HR1200, S703) and not so similar proposals?

The answers to these questions, and more, will be found at the web site of Physician for a National Health Program. www.pnhp.org. The text of the bill can be found on google.

Type in HR 676.

To save you time, I offer some short answers :

What does single payer mean?It means that the government sets aside the taxes it collects for this purpose and pays the bills. The taxes, in this case are a 2% income tax and a 7% payroll tax.
Will it be another big bureaucracy?No. The big one is the one we have now, with multiple duplicating and fragmented entities--investors and their HMOs/PPOs.

How will HR676 work?We get an identification card, show it to our doctors, hospitals, etc. We are not billed, have no co-pays or deductibles.

Can we afford it? Who will pay for it?It will cost less, and we will pay less, than what we pay now. We all--except the poor-- pay:2% of income, 7% of payroll.

Is it “socialized medicine” ?No. That term means that the government owns the hospitals and employs the doctors. Here the doctors and hospitals are independent.
Why include everyone?Because that is the most efficient, lowest-cost way. And morally right. 22,000 of us die each year for want of health care.

Can we combine a single payer plan with for-profit plans?No. When we put everyone in one group, the costs are as low as they can be. When we have for-profit investors alongside, they will--as they have done--siphon off the low-cost young and healthy.
Does this bill have a chance of passage in Congress? It now has 75 co-sponsors in the House. It has wide public support: physicians, nurses, unions, the NAACP, the League of Women Voters, others.

What about the other proposals before Congress?In the Senate, Bernie Sanders has introduced a single-payer bill that stresses rural health centers and family doctor training (S703). In the House, Jim McDermott has introduced a bill similar to it (HR1200). Max Baucus and Ted Kennedy are meeting with people to put together a bill; but the people they are talking to are for-profits. S703 and HR 1200 also need our support.

MORE QUESTIONS? Please write to me, since I have done some reading. Or see the bill and PNHP.You may want to know what will happen to Medicare and Medicaid, VA hospitals, US employees’plans; what will happen to investors in HMOs, to their facilities and employees; how the US subsidizes health care today; how we got so stuck in the present system.

Bailout for East End Land ?

April 25, 2009

Congressman Tim Bishop
137 Hampton Road
Southampton, New York, 11968

Dear Congressman Bishop:

The Community Preservation Funds of the five east end towns are
shrinking as the real estate market is dying. But building has not
stopped and we will lose even more open space when the economy
revives.

We could take advantage of the comparative lull in the destruction
of our open space if we can get some Federal funds to allow the
towns to buy land.

Also there are numerous parcels which are known to be the
sites of native and colonial era burial grounds. For example:
In Southampton the town was not able to buy all of the Romeo
property in the Shinnecock Hills. Limitations in the amount
of a single purchase from the the Community Preservation Fund
was a factor. The owner is now paving a portion of the land
and has or will soon offer the property for sale as building lots ...
building over a cemetery! This should stop.

Can you propose legislation what would get some of the
Federal stimulus funds to help us 'Save What's Left"?

Please let me know what your thoughts are on this.

Anthony Ernst
Southampton
_______________________________________________

During a meeting on environmental legislation in Cutchogue on April 25, Mr. Bishop expressed interest in this "Bailout for East End Land" proposal. Those interested are invited to write
in support. The congressman can be contacted through his web site.

Long Island Wins: Immigrant Communities Commend Senators for Exploring Start to Reform Immigration

Thursday, April 30, 2009
Port Washington, NY - Today, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) will hold his first hearing as Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Refugees. The hearing is titled Comprehensive Immigration Reform in 2009, Can We Do It and How?” and is expected to explore the national need to reform immigration, and the feasibility for legislation this year. The following is a statement by Maryann Sinclair Slutsky, Campaign Director of Long Island Wins:

“We are encouraged by the Judiciary Subcommittee’s hearing today and commend Senator Schumer’s willingness to discuss the urgent need to reform immigration for America . The hearing follows recent comments by the White House on its commitment to reform immigration, and represents a very positive indication that immigration reform is on track and moving forward in this Congress. This is another sign that momentum is building for Congress to reform immigration this year.”
“The Subcommittee is expected to hear testimony from a wide range of panelists, including notable experts and from law enforcement, economics, faith, labor, and civil rights. These panelists will testify about the nation’s need for immigration reform. Here on Long Island, we see everyday, how reform would impact and improve the economic, spiritual, and civic life of our American communities.”
“Families and communities, immigrant and native-born alike should feel there is good reason to hope and to renew faith in a government that is willing to find practical solutions that reflect the best of our shared American values, and not succumb to the petty politics of fear and hate.”
“As many communities prepare for tomorrow’s vigils and rallies, today’s hearing explores some of the very substantive reasons why America needs reform of its immigration system. It is clear - America needs a just, fair, and humane immigration system that protects and upholds our shared American values, that protect families, workers, and the economy. We need a practical solution that works.”
“Congress needs to reform immigration so that all working families in America are protected equally. We need to reform immigration for all families and communities, and for the long-term economic recovery that America needs.”

_______________________
Contact: Maryann Sinclair Slutsky, 516 304-5641, mslutsky@longislandwins.com



Week of April 30: click here for updates

Who can protest and does not is an accomplice in the act _The Talmud

Southampton Town Board: Please Consider Graves Protection Law

Join the campaign for Rights for Black Farmers

Long Island Wins Blog: May 1 - Why will you march?


Peace and Justice Calendar: "Encounter Point", Israelis and Palestinians work for Peace - film in Huntington Sunday May 2

Suffolk Peace Vigils - East End Women in Black - 3pm Sunday in Bridgehamton

Casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan

Democracy Now!

The independent news hour with Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez:
on Riverhead/Southampton/Southold/Shelter Island
Channel 20:

Note: Channels 20 (public access) and 22 (government meetings) now require a digital capable TV or converter box and have been removed from the basic cable service in violation of contracts with the east end towns. Call your Town Council members to find out what they are doing about this.

Starting April 1 - new schedule for Democracy Now!

Monday 6:30 am

Tuesday 6 PM

Wednesday 8 PM

Thursday 10 PM

Friday 6:30 am

Saturday - 10 PM

Also on WUSB 90.1 FM 5 PM Mon-Friday and East Hampton LTV Ch 20

______________________________________________

Send comments to EastEndReport@yahoo.com

email subscribers: To un-subscribe: reply with "DON'T SEND" in the subject line to eastendreport@yahoo.com

International Women's Peace Service - West Bank Land Confiscation


IWPS House Report No. 136
Settlers form Revava illegal settlement start installing water pipes on Haris villagers land
On Friday the 17th April in the morning we received a call from a worried Haris resident who is the owner of the land close to the nearby Revava settlement.
The villager told us that a group of man, some of them armed, have arrived with the bulldozer and were working on his land.
IWPS went to investigate and found Revava settlement security staff and the workman operating a digger , as well as a dozen concerned Palestinians who came to find out what was happening. The security person said that they were planning to replace the old water pipes which were supplying water for the settlement from the well in the Haris resident's field.
The settlers could not produce any paperwork permitting the digging and the IWPS reported the incident to the Palestinian Authority who informed the Israeli army and police.
They promised to intervene and when this was conveyed to the settlers they left but said that they would return with the required permit to continue with the work.
On Monday the 20th April the settlers were back accompanied by two Israeli soldiers and have dug a wide truncheon about 50 metres long for the new larger replacement water pipe.
We contacted the Palestinian Authority and they confirmed that the settlers have been issued a permit for the work and that no further action could be taken against them.
During our visit to the field on Thursday the 23rd we established that the settlers' work extended to the land of a second Palestinian who was the owner of about the half of the land in question. He expressed his doubts to us that the settlers had a permit to carry out the digging, because they failed to produce it when he requested it.
We have referred both Palestinians to the organisations providing specialist legal support with the issues arising from the Israeli occupation, including the issues of land confiscation and usurpation by the settlers.
The affected Palestinians see the settlers' work in their fields as a violation of their property rights. In the past a large chunks of their land were taken away illegally and without their consent by the Israeli army and the settlers and some of it was used for the build of one of the tallest watch towers in the West Bank based near the entrance to Haris.